Contact

Nutrition Facts Panel 101 (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Wendy Benson, Food and Nutrition Consultant

Most Canadian food packages include the Nutrition Facts Panel – the white box with black wording (and only in sans serif fonts!) The Nutrition Facts Panel must include a minimum of 13 nutrients, the nutrient value, and percent Daily Value for many of the 13 nutrients. About 60 per cent of Canadian shoppers use the Nutrition Facts panel when purchasing groceries (Canadian Council of Food and Nutrition [2008] Tracking Nutrition Trends VII).

The single best use of the Nutrition Facts panels is to compare foods to each other and learn which foods have 15 per cent or more Daily Value (or a lot of a nutrient) or less than 5 per cent (or a little) Daily Value. It’s best to compare foods in similar categories, such as comparing crackers to crackers or salad dressings to other salad dressings. Pulses, however, are such a unique food, there are few good comparison foods.

Interpreting the Nutrition Facts panel has two steps. Go to a cupboard or pantry, pull out a few similar foods, and start to compare.

Step 1

Check the Serving Size for the food. Serving sizes can vary on food products, even for foods in the same category. For example, some canned pulses are 125 mL, others are 250 mL. Dried pulses also range in serving size from 35 to 100 g (uncooked). Many canned soups are based on 250 mL servings.

Step 2

Compare similar foods and start with the nutrients that you would like to know more about and focus on per cent Daily Value. The following is a short list of the many nutrients pulses can brag about:

  • Fibre: Black beans have 10 g fibre (40 per cent Daily Value) compared to black bean soup with 7 g (28 per cent Daily Value) fibre. A few other foods to compare are two slices whole wheat bread with 3 g (12 per cent) and bran cereals with 6 g fibre. Foods with 4 g or more per serving can include a claim the food is ‘very high in fibre.’ Surprisingly few foods can make this claim.
  • Fat: Pulses are naturally low in fat, with many canned and dried products reporting 1 g fat (1 per cent Daily Value). The Spicy Black Bean soup has 3 g fat (5 per cent Daily Value). All are under 5 per cent of the Daily Value, demonstrating pulses and broth-style soups are low fat foods.
  • Iron: Pulses themselves have different iron levels with dried split peas (cooked) and canned white kidney beans at 20 per cent Daily Value; black beans and chickpeas at 25 per cent; and lentils at 30 per cent Daily Value. Black bean soup has 20 per cent Daily Value. Pulses compare well to beef, which would have about 15 per cent Daily Value for iron. Iron in pulses has a caveat because our guts absorb less iron from plant sources than animal foods. Therefore, pulses should be eaten with a food high in vitamin C (such as green peppers or potatoes) or meat to help increase iron absorption.
  • Protein: Canadian food labels do not have percent Daily Value for protein because protein requirements shift significantly with age. The protein in pulses is typically 12-16 g and the canned soup has 8 gram protein. Whole pulses compare well to ground beef, which has 20 g protein.
  • Sodium: Dried pulses have small amounts of natural sodium in the food (5 mg dried or 0 per cent Daily Value). The bean soup has 480 mg (20 per cent Daily Value) sodium; and canned beans have significant sodium at 12 to 18 per cent Daily Value. However, canned beans can be drained and rinsed, reducing the sodium by 40 per cent. This typically lowers sodium to 170-210 mg, which is 8 to 10 per cent Daily Value. President’s Choice Blue Menu® canned beans are one of the first no added salt canned beans Canadians can buy.

This tour of the Nutrition Facts Panel leads to an overall good impression of pulses. They are a decent source of protein, have little fat, and are excellent sources of fibre and iron.

Size Matters

When describing the amount of nutrient in a food, serving size is critical for accurate comparisons. The Step 2 comparisons are based on:

1 cup (250 mL) cooked or canned pulses

1 cup (250 mL) canned soup

1 cup (250 mL) cold cereal

250 mL is about the size of a softball

100 g (3.5 oz) uncooked ground beef. When cooked, this is about the size of a deck of cards

Adding Daily Values is meaningless

Daily Values are based on grams, milligrams, and micrograms required for human nutrients. As nutrient needs are different for men, women, children, and seniors, the Daily Value is a ‘composite person.’ In effect, it’s one-part teenage girl (to meet iron needs), one-part sedentary adults (nutrients for a 2,000 calorie diet), one-part adult woman (to meet calcium needs), etc.

Because Daily Value is a composite person, it cannot be used to determine if our diet meets specific recommendations. For example, eating 10 foods with 10 per cent of the Daily Value for iron might lead to a diet low in iron for a young woman while it will be more than enough for an eight year old.

2012 Alberta Regional Variety Trials (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Alexander Fedko, Alberta Agriculture

The Alberta Regional Variety Testing Trials (RVTs) are a key source of information to the agriculture industry regarding the yield potential and field performance of new pulse varieties. The trials are managed by a team of research experts to minimize variability. These trials provide unbiased, comprehensive information that assists producers to make better cropping decisions and higher profits.

The Alberta RVTs flourished in 2012 thanks to early moisture and midsummer heat. Seeding was done into good soil moisture conditions and on time. Emergence was uniform. Frequent spring precipitations kept soil well saturated, but never caused flooding conditions except in the Peace region where soil moisture was rated as excessive. Then the hot weather of July and August may have reduced field peas yield potential at some locations possibly due to plants being shallow rooted.

The Regional Variety Trials examine seed yield as well as other data, such as plant height, standability at physiological maturity, disease reaction, and thousand seed weight. Varieties within each table are arranged in alphabetical order. The check variety for each crop type is displayed in bold at the top of the table. Cultivar yield data is shown as percent of the check, and the station years of testing column is located beside the yield. Caution is advised when interpreting the data with respect to new varieties that have not been fully tested.

The CV stands for coefficients of variation (CV) in the trial and is expressed as a percentage. Large CVs mean a large amount of variation could not be attributed to differences between varieties. The lower the CV the better is the quality of data.

There were 17 green and yellow pea sites established across Alberta and two sites in North Eastern British Colombia. Sites in Alberta consisted of five green plus two checks (Cooper and CDC Patrick) and five yellow plus a new check (CDC Meadow) cultivars replicated four times in a randomized complete block design. Only two green and three yellow variety trials failed due to various reasons.

Chickpea and lentil trials underwent major changes this year. From now on, there will be only one joined desi and kabuli chickpea trial and one (early and late) lentil trial. Nine chickpea varieties plus check (CDC Frontier) were grown at Bow Island, Brooks, Lethbridge, and Medicine Hat. All the chickpea variety trials were successfully harvested. Unfortunately, the yield results for the trial at Medicine Hat were not added to the database due to unacceptable CV.

2012 was a successful year for growing Lentil trials. 19 varieties plus a check (CDC Redberry) were well grown at Bow Island, Brooks, Lethbridge, and Medicine Hat.

Wide row dry bean trials were grown at Bow Island, Lethbridge, and Vauxhall, and the narrow row dry bean had two sites, at Lethbridge and Vauxhall. There were 12 varieties including checks in both trials and all grown under irrigation. The wide row locations had a complete set of data; however, only the Vauxhall data set was included in the database because 112 km/h winds blew the Lethbridge trial all over beyond repairs at harvest time.

Again, there were no fababean regional trials grown in 2012 due to no new varieties being registered.

Varieties displaying a symbol (❀) are subject to Plant Breeder’s Rights (PBR). Any unauthorized sale of seed of these varieties is an infringement under the act. Under PBR, farmers are allowed to save seed of the variety for their own use, to plant on their own farms.

We would like to acknowledge the hard work of all the people who seed, maintain, take field data, harvest, and process grain samples from the variety trials. The research organizations that were involved in testing are Agricultural Research and Extension Council of Alberta; Battle River Research Group; Chinook Applied Research Association; Lakeland Agricultural Research Association; MacKenzie Applied Research Association; Peace Agricultural Research Demonstration Association; Southern Applied Research Association; and Smokey Applied Research Demonstration Association; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lacombe and Lethbridge Research Stations; Agriculture and Rural Development Research Stations in Brooks and Edmonton; BC Grain Producers; and Viterra. As well, we appreciate hard work of the crop coordinators, APG staff, ARD staff, and pulse breeders who reviewed the results of the testing and updated diseases and other agronomic information.

And finally, without financial support, this publication would not be possible. A sincere thank you to Alberta Pulse Grower Commission for contributing to the Pulse Science Cluster Project that is run under Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Growing Forward program; to breeders and seed companies for paying testing fees (Alliance Seed Corporation, Crop Development Centre at University of Saskatchewan and FP Genetics Inc.); to the Association of Alberta Co-op Seed Cleaning Plants, the Alberta Seed Growers’ Association, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Finally, about two-thirds of our trials were Alberta producers’ fields, and we appreciate their cooperation and dedication as well.

New Pulse Varieties on the Way (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Dr. Bunyamin Tar’an, Dr. Bert Vandenberg, and Dr. Tom Warkentin

Pea

Market Class: Yellow Peas

In the Market

In 2012, according to data from Saskatchewan (SK) Crop Insurance Corporation, CDC Meadow became the most widely grown field pea cultivar in SK, surpassing CDC Golden. CDC Meadow has also been one of the top varieties in Alberta, Manitoba, and the northern United States (U.S.). It has been popular with growers due to its consistently high yield, lodging resistance, competitiveness with weeds, and favourable seed type. CDC Golden remained a strong second to CDC Meadow in terms of insured acres in 2012, while the next most widely grown yellow pea varieties were CDC Bronco, DS Admiral, and Delta.

New Varieties
  • Certified seed of CDC Saffron should become available in 2014 or 2015. It has good yield (when compared to Cutlass, 115 per cent in both the southern and northern regions), and medium-large smooth, round seeds.
  • Certified seed of CDC Hornet should become available in 2013 or 2014. It has good yield (when compared to Cutlass, 107 per cent in both the southern and northern regions), with good lodging resistance and medium maturity.
  • Certified seed of CDC Treasure will be available in 2013. It has good yield (when compared to Cutlass, 105 per cent in the south and 110 per cent in the north), with good lodging resistance and early maturity.
  • Certified seed of CDC Centennial (large seed size) and CDC Prosper (small seed size) will also be available in 2013.
Looking Ahead

Breeder seed of CDC Amarillo (2462-30) was released for the first time in 2012. CDC Amarillo has had strong yield performance in SK regional trials over the past two years with a mean yield when compared to Cutlass of 119 per cent in the south and 131 per cent in the north. CDC Amarillo is relatively tall, with one of the best lodging resistance ratings among pea varieties in Western Canada.

Market Class: Green Peas

In the Market

For the sixth year in a row, CDC Striker was the most widely grown green pea variety. It has been popular with growers due to its consistently high yield, lodging resistance, and smooth, round, and durable seeds. It also has excellent bleaching resistance and is preferred in the market. CDC Patrick was the second most widely grown green pea variety in 2012. On average, it is actually higher yielding than CDC Striker and CDC Sage, while maintaining good seed quality. CDC Patrick generally performs better in somewhat drier seasons, as compared to years with more precipitation. CDC Sage was the third most widely grown green pea variety. It has smaller seed size when compared to CDC Striker and a high quality level as well. Cooper and Espace were the next most widely grown green pea varieties in 2012.

CDC Tetris is an ‘Espace type’ variety with blocky seed shape, which has specific demand in China for snack food markets. Certified seed of CDC Tetris will start to become available in 2013.

CDC Pluto is a green pea variety with small, round seeds and good bleaching resistance. Also, it has an intense green colour, which should fit well into rehydration and canning markets. Certified seed of CDC Pluto should become available in 2014.

New Varieties

Certified seed of CDC Raezer should become available in 2014 or 2015. It has good yield (when compared to Cutlass, 102 per cent in the south and 108 per cent in the north), with powdery mildew resistance and a seed type, similar to CDC Striker.

Looking Ahead

Breeder seed of CDC Limerick (2336-1) was released for the first time in 2012. CDC Limerick has had strong yield performance in Saskatchewan regional trials over the past two years with mean yield (when compared to Cutlass) of 108 per cent in the south and 114 per cent in the north. CDC Limerick has nice seed traits, but with a greater protein concentration than other green or yellow pea varieties. This may provide an advantage in fractionation markets.

Speciality Market Class: Dun, Maple, and Forage Pea

In the Market

CDC Rocket and CDC Acer are the dominant maple pea varieties in SK. CDC Rocket fits better in the northern part of the province due to its earlier maturity, while CDC Acer fits better in the south.

CDC Tucker, CDC Leroy, and CDC Horizon are forage pea varieties with high biomass yield, powdery mildew resistance, good lodging resistance, and semi-leafless leaf type. These varieties produce on average four to five tonnes per acre of forage dry matter, similar to that of forage barley, but with greater protein concentration.

New Varieties

CDC Mosaic is a new maple pea variety that is a similar seed type as CDC Acer, but with improved lodging resistance. Certified seed of CDC Mosaic should come available in 2014. Breeder seed of the dun pea variety CDC Dakota was first released in 2010. It has been one of the top yielders in the SK regional trial in 2010-2012. The dun type would typically be dehulled and sold in human consumption markets in India. Certified seed of CDC Dakota should become available in limited quantities in 2013.

Looking Ahead

Over the next couple of years, expect to see new forage, maple, and dun pea varieties with improvements over previous varieties. In addition, we may release Breeder seed of a red cotyledon pea variety in 2013.

Lentil

The Variety Release Program was designed to allow growers in all lentil-growing areas to have widespread and rapid access to new genetics. By staying in touch with your local seed growers and using the seed guide, you should be able to identify the variety most likely to perform well in your area under your soil and climate conditions.

The lentil crop is dynamic because seed multiplication ratios are high, especially for small-seeded market classes. Lately, we have had some exceptional years for moisture in most of the lentil growing area, so no one knows if the current scenarios (in terms of variety performance) will shift if the weather pendulum swings back to drier conditions. In the 2013 seed guide, a significant change is that all lentil yield data were expressed in terms of percentage of CDC Maxim red lentil, the most widely grown variety today. Some of the older varieties with little current production were removed from the list. The basic goals of the breeding program remain the development of new herbicide options for lentils, improved disease resistance, improved quality, and, of course, higher yield.

Market Class: Large Green

In the Market

Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (SCIC) insures about 80 per cent of the lentil crop. Of the reported variety acres, CDC Greenland is still the most widely grown large green lentil (about 50 per cent of the acres). Its superior colour retention can result in premiums. The older large green varieties are pretty much gone. The imidazolinone-tolerant large greens like CDC Improve (20 per cent) are gaining ground but not necessarily in areas where Group 2 resistant weeds are now a problem. CDC Impower is still in the ramping up stage (about 5 per cent). All others have declined to 5 per cent or below of large green acres.

New Varieties

Breeder seed of CDC Greenstar (formerly known as 3339-3) will be available in the spring of 2013. The winter and summer increases were successful so there will be no shortage of seed. This line consistently outyields all other large green lentils and, so far, is rated at 105 per cent of CDC Maxim. Head to head with all the other large greens, based on about 60 trials in total over the past four years, we are looking at a minimum increase in yield of 10 per cent. It has better anthracnose resistance ratings than all other large greens. The seed is larger than most other varieties, slightly smaller than CDC Improve.

Looking Ahead

We are definitely on course for developing an imidazolinone version of CDC Greenstar for release within two years.

Market Class: Other Greens and Specialty Lentils

In the Market

For small green acres where variety is reported, about 55 per cent are CDC Invincible and about 35 per cent are CDC Viceroy. All other small green varieties and all other market classes make up the rest, each variety all of them less than 4 per cent. The total reported for French green varieties was a little over 20,000 acres, about 40 per cent CDC Peridot and 20 per cent LeMay of the acres reported by variety.

New Varieties

CDC Asterix is an up and coming extra small green variety with seed about 20 per cent smaller compared to CDC Viceroy. It is a conventional type with some possibility for specialized marketing in specific regions.

Looking Ahead

In 2013, we plan to release breeder seed of the conventional French green variety CDC Marble in 2013 (yield is 119 per cent of Maxim so far) and possibly 3592-13 small green (110 per cent of Maxim). CDC Marble consistently outyields all other lentil lines regardless of market class, and we are using it to establish new higher yielding genetic base for all market classes. All varieties are on track for conversion to imidazolinone tolerance.

Market Class: Red Lentils In the Market

We estimate that 65 per cent of the 830,000 million red lentil acres reported by SCIC in 2011 were CDC Maxim, and the real figure could be higher if all acres were reported by variety. The extra small red varieties CDC Rosetown, CDC Imperial, and CDC Impala in total are now less than 2 per cent of the area. No one yet knows if a return to drier conditions will undermine the yield performance of CDC Maxim, which so far has done well in years with above average moisture.

New Varieties

New varieties like CDC Dazil (CL), CDC Imax (CL), and conventional varieties like CDC Redcoat, CDC Redcliff, CDC Redbow, and CDC Rosebud are grown on a very limited scale right now because they were released after CDC Maxim. As growers try them out, local performance will determine which of these become more widely grown. We recommend that growers pay attention to what performs well in their area. We know from previous experience that if we enter a drier cycle, red lentil performance can shift to favour the longer season varieties.

Looking Ahead

CDC Scarlet (small red) and CDC Rosie (extra small), both conventional types, show some promise. All have high yield potential and good lodging tolerance. All promising conventional varieties are in the process of conversion to imidazolinone tolerant varieties.

Chickpeas

We continue to develop high-yielding chickpea cultivars with improved resistance to ascochyta blight and general agronomic traits with acceptable seed quality for domestic and international markets. Specific objectives for kabuli chickpea breeding include developing cultivars with various seed sizes, acceptable visual seed characteristics, and canning/ cooking quality. For desi chickpea, specific objectives for breeding include developing cultivars with acceptable visual seed characters (shape, size, colour).

In 2012, we saw CDC Frontier dominate the production side. Growers should consider switching to new varieties that have higher yield potential as soon as seeds become available. As with all chickpea varieties, initial fungicide application is needed at the seedling to pre-flowering stage, in order to limit early ascochyta blight spore development and spread. Growers are required to diligently monitor their fields for disease and spray decision if necessary. Chickpeas should be planted on stubble, especially in wet years – avoid lower-lying or poorly drained fields and heavy clay soil that retains moisture.

In the Market

The last kabuli cultivar, CDC Leader, was released to select growers in 2011. The average seed weight of CDC Leader is around 390–400g per 1,000 seeds (9–10 mm diameter). CDC Leader is an earlier maturing cultivar than CDC Frontier. It has fair resistance to ascochyta blight.

CDC Leader so far had consistently high yield, comparable to CDC Frontier, on both Brown and Dark Brown soil zones. CDC Orion and CDC Alma were released to select growers in 2010. CDC Orion is a large seeded (10–11 mm diameter) kabuli cultivar. CDC Orion has a good adaptation on both Brown and Dark Brown soil zones of southern Saskatchewan and southeastern of Alberta. CDC Orion is on the late side on maturity similar to CDC Frontier. CDC Alma is a medium-to-large seed size (9-mm diameter) kabuli, slightly larger than CDC Frontier. CDC Alma has the higher end of fair rating for ascochyta blight, similar to CDC Luna. Growers are required to monitor their fields diligently for disease and spray if necessary.

New Varieties

A limited amount of seed for a new desi cultivar, CDC 603-3, will be available to select growers in 2013. CDC 603-3 has a light tan seed coat colour, which is one of the desirable visual seed characteristics of desi. The longterm (five years) yield average of CDC 603-3 is 110 per cent of the check cultivar (Amit) on both Brown and Dark Brown Soil zone. The average seed size of CDC603-3 is 306g/1,000 seeds, with a long-term ascochyta score of 4.1. CDC 603-3 has a medium-to-late maturity range similar to CDC Vanguard.

Public Private Partnerships in Pulse Breeding (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Ron Pidskalny

Declining public research investment and very recent budget cuts across the federal public service, specifically in agriculture, have underscored the need for an industry-wide plan to maintain and enhance pulse breeding in Canada in order to remain competitive against other cropping options. Currently, the Canadian pulse industry relies heavily upon publically generated varieties, predominantly those developed at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) and the Crop Development Centre (CDC). Very few private pulse varieties are available in Canada. Fewer varieties mean less choice for growers and point towards a general long-term decline for the Canadian pulse industry.

In Canada, discussions regarding the future of crop research funding in Canada has focussed on the role of public plant breeders as public sector funding declines and as the level of participation in plant breeding research declines. One question may sum up the debate: Should the public sector be involved in crop breeding where variety development is feasible and profitable?

Debates over the roles of the public and private sector in plant breeding go back at least a decade, starting with a global move towards the privatization of a number of national plant breeding programs. Discussions centred on finding a balance between the public and the private sector. Many felt that maintaining public research programs at public expense had to provide a tangible public benefit and should not compete directly with the private sector. Those leading the discussion recognized that public sector plant breeders could provide benefits to society that would not be within the mandate of the private sector.

That said, many recognize a need to maintain a balance between public and private sector plant breeding operations. Producers are concerned that any shift in balance towards the private sector could create situations in which they lose their voice in crop development decisions, small acreage crops become neglected, and the level of collaboration and sharing of IP among researchers declines. Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) provide a model for exploring a balance between the interest of the public and the private sector.

Issues in the Pulse Sector

Alberta Pulse Growers commissioned a report about Public-Private Partnerships called Impediments to Private Sector Investments in Canadian Pulse Breeding, which tracked over $85 million in investments in pulse crop breeding over 10 years from 17 major funders of pulse breeding research in Western Canada. The report included an overview of Canadian pulse breeding capacity, the cost of pulse variety development in Canada, means of protecting intellectual property rights for plant breeders in Canada, and an examination of existing value capture systems for varieties and traits in nations against which Canadian producers compete.

The report showed a number of issues in the pulse sector. Some public sector Canadian plant breeders run programs that have been running with marginally sufficient or inadequate funding for years. Program funding for public sector plant breeders has not only dropped substantially for decades, inflation has reduced the spending power of plant breeders by almost 150 percent over 30 years, suggesting that inflation reduces the output of plant breeding programs by over three percent annually.

Not only is research funding for the public sector declining, so is research capacity as the public sector downsizes and rationalizes its research programs and as senior scientists retire. In addition, the industry is consolidating, and the field of genomics will soon have tremendous impact on the development of new technologies for agricultural crops, especially in the area of stress tolerance.

Alberta Pulse Growers, Manitoba Pulse Growers, and Saskatchewan Pulse Growers have worked hard to increase pulse acres since 1980. Western Canadian producers seeded 282,000 ac of dry beans (white and coloured), 180,000 ac of chickpeas, 2.6 million ac of lentils, and 3.5 million ac of dry peas in 2012. However, corn, soybean, and wheat production in the U.S. and canola production in Canada illustrate how technological advancements in some crops can have a significant impact on alternative cropping choices.

Private breeding successes in other crops

In other crops, private sector plant breeders have introduced a number of newer, high value traits with development costs of up to $100 million per trait. Resistance to Corn Root Worm was one of the first high value traits introduced, with a total investment in excess of $300 million, which was an enormous sum relative to what would have been available in a public sector research budget.

Companies made the decision to develop and commercialize CRW resistant corn in anticipation of a good return on their investments. This created a situation in which acres seeded to CRW-resistant corn exceeded the area previously treated with CRW insecticides. As corn acres increased in response to demand from bioethanol producers, net benefits of the CRW-resistant technology to farmers and to the developer were double the initial expectations. Investments could be justified based on the high levels of protection afforded varietal traits in the corn market. The trait premium not only provided good returns to the plant breeders, the companies priced the trait below the actual value to the average farmer.

In comparison with corn breeders, wheat breeders in the US are less able to protect their IP. In areas where farmers have traditionally saved seed, this has been a particularly serious impediment to investment in wheat breeding. Where wheat breeders have protected IP, they must take unilateral action to enforce their rights – and the potential cost of legal action, combined with the possibility of negative publicity, seems to have discouraged many wheat breeders from doing so. The shift in acreage of corn and wheat may reflect the issue of IP protection; the area sown to wheat in the US has dropped 30 percent since the 1980s, although some of this reduction may be attributed to the competitiveness of high-yielding corn varieties in spite of the high price of seed corn.

As abiotic stress tolerance is added to new varieties, however, gross margin and contribution margin at the farm gate could rise in crops such as wheat and canola. Water Use Efficiency (WUE) may soon reach the field in varieties with tolerance to temperature extremes, tolerance to drought stress, and tolerance to salinity. Some nations are ahead of Canada in bringing these traits to the field. Australian plant breeders commercialized a WUE wheat variety in 2004 and expect to bring Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) in wheat and barley to market within three years. WUE is in development as part of a public-private partnership in wheat in the US and NUE is in development in canola in Canada.

These varieties have improved environmental stability, which also reduces on-farm risk and lowers the cost of risk management programs. In addition, this gives nations against which Canadian producers must compete the capacity to produce a greater range of commodities at a lower price. Assuming that these technologies eventually reach Canadian producers, barley, canola, and wheat may become more desirable crops as farmers realize higher gross margins and contribution margins. This, then, leads to the question: where does this leave pulse crops as rotational options in Western Canada if they become less profitable to grow relative to other rotational crops?

Advances in wheat genetics technology, the development of private sector wheat breeding programs in Canada, declining funding and support for publicly supported pulse breeding in Canada, and the cost of new genetic traits and technologies suggest that pulse crop contribution and gross margins may not keep pace with alternative crops at the farm gate. Producers are seeing more lucrative opportunities in crops other than pulses and are shifting acres to those crops with higher contribution and gross margins. If pulse margins fail to keep pace with those of other crops, pulse acres may decline.

Gains in pulse productivity realized over the past 30 years could decline without the infusion of innovative technological advances.

Investment in plant breeding critical

Capturing the potential value of new traits may require higher levels of investment in plant breeding. Abiotic stress traits could take up to 15 years to move from gene discovery to commercial seed sales. The cost of development could range from $5 million to over $100 million.

Assuming that investments in pulse breeding continues at its present level of about $2.1 million annually per pulse crop, a trait valued at $5 million could be introduced to a single pulse crop within three years – but only if the all of the investment in that crop went towards that single trait. A $100 million trait would come around for a single pulse crop once every 47 years. One option for bringing more investment to pulse breeding is to encourage the private sector to invest in Canada; however, this may not be the only option.

Currently, the private sector is looking for opportunities to create value in traditionally public sector crops. At the same time, producers are looking for more investment in public plant breeding programs. In many cases, public plant breeding institutions lack of access to new technology and funding levels are declining. This has led to a number of cases in which the public and private sector have entered into collaborative plant breeding arrangements.

In one of the first partnerships, University of California Berkeley and Novartis Agricultural Discovery Institute entered into an agreement in which Novartis gave U of C Berkeley $25M over five years for agricultural genomics research. In return, U of C Berkley gave Novartis access to its DNA databases and some of its proprietary genetic technology. U of C Berkley retained patent rights and earned royalties from its discoveries while Novartis had the first right to license inventions from the Department of Plant and Microbial Biology. If producers choose to do so, they have the opportunity to enter into a wide range of relationships with the private sector in order to procure access to new pulse technologies and traits.

Adaptable, flexible, and enabling environment

Existing seed policies and the slow pace of change continue to constrain the seed industry. Canadian producers have endured Canadian Seed Sector Review process that has taken place for over a decade, in addition to dealing with a wide range of other seed sector issues. A key requirement for both public and private sector plant breeders is an adaptable, flexible, and enabling regulatory environment.

When motivated, the private sector has proven that it can bring considerable resources to breeding programs relative to the public sector. As such, Western Canada’s pulse growers are studying opportunities for a PPP in pulse breeding for the benefit of Western Canadian pulse growers over the next five to six months.

As the global agricultural sector changes and evolves rapidly, commercial frames of opportunity often open and close very quickly. Some argue that the country’s seed regulatory system continues to be outdated and has left Canada’s agricultural sector at risk. Policies are in need of modernization and must support entrepreneurial innovation.

Pulse Researcher Profile – Manjula Bandara (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Driven to work in the agriculture industry because of his “curiosity and passion for discovery and facing challenges,” Dr. Manjula Bandara, Research Scientist – Pulse and Special Crops at the Crop Diversification Centre in Brooks, graduated with a Ph.D. in Whole Crop Physiology / Agronomy from the University of Saskatchewan in 1989.

After working as a researcher in Sri Lanka for two years, Dr. Bandara returned to Saskatoon and soon began working as a researcher at the Crop Development Centre until 1999. Since then, he has worked with Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development as the lead of the Pulse and Special Crops Program at the Crop Diversification Centre South in Brooks. Dr. Bandara is also an Adjunct professor of the Biological Sciences of the University of Lethbridge and the Department of Plant Sciences of the University of Saskatchewan.

Read on to learn more about the work that Dr. Bandara is doing in the pulse industry.

Background

“I have been involving in lentil and chickpea cultivar development for Alberta, in collaboration with the Pulse Crops Breeding Program at the University of Saskatchewan. I am very happy to state that I was able to be involved in developing several red lentil cultivars, including CDC Redcliff, CDC Rosebud, CDC Redbow, CDC KR-1, CDC Maxim, CDC Rosie, and CDC Asterix, and Kabuli chickpea cultivar CDC Orion.”

Research Interests

“I really enjoy working on pulse crops and other speciality crops that are new to this region. Selecting and developing new crops to extreme growing environments are challenging, so I amtrying my best to face those production obstacles. I am interested in the areas of crop improvement, manipulation of growth and development of crop plants to suit to growing environment, and manipulation of secondary metabolites (functional compound composition) by manipulating the growing conditions. My favourite area of research is studying the relative contribution of yield components for pulse crop yields.

Currently, I am working three major research areas with my research and technical team.

1. Pulse crop improvement in collaboration with the Pulse Crops Breeding Program at the University of Saskatchewan, mainly on red lentil and Kabuli chickpea. In addition, some lines received from ICARDA, Syria, and ICRISAT, India are being tested in southern Alberta for adaptability. I am working on new pulses, such as mung bean, black gram, moth bean, and cowpea, to develop new varieties of these crops. In collaboration with other researchers and specialists, I am working on winter pulses (field peas and lentils) too. I am also involved in conducting cultivar evaluation and irrigation schedule development for soybean with fellow researcher Ted Harms of Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development.

2. Agronomic/physiological studies. As a team member, I am involving in developing a production package for Clearfield lentils (Robyne Bowness is the project lead). In this project, we look at the effect of soil nitrogen content on rood nodulation, plant population density, and efficacy of different ‘Imidazolinones’ herbicides on weed control and crop tolerance of Clearfield lentils. This is a Ph.D. graduate level project, and I serve as co-supervisor to the student at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge. Another project that I am involved in is the growth and development of Kabuli chickpeas, using plant growth regulators. This M.Sc. level project is conducted at Brooks and Bow Island, and the graduate student, whom I supervise, is studying in the Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan.

3. I am also involved in conducting production system studies, in collaborating with Dr. Yantai Gan, AAFC Swift Current, to optimize frequency and sequence of annual pulse in cereal-based cropping system. In the study, chickpea, field pea, and lentil have been included as pulse crops in the spring wheat-based crop rotation.

The occurrence of relatively warm, dry, and long frost-free growing conditions in the southern region of Alberta is favorable for the production of high-quality pulse crops, particularly lentils, chickpeas, soybean, mung bean, and black gram, provided suitable varieties are available. Thus, cultivar development activities on pulse crops are necessary.”

A Look at Alberta’s Pulse Breeders (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Alberta is home to three pulse breeding programs: one for peas; one for beans; and one for lentils and chickpeas. Read on to learn more about these programs and the pulse breeders who lead them.

AAFC’s Pea Breeding Program

Pea country in Alberta stretches from north to south and east to west, and in the heart of it is Dr. Deng-jin Bing, a pea breeder for Agriculture and Agri-food Canada who has been responsible for developing some of the best pea varieties in Western Canada.

“Our primary effort of the program is to develop genetically improved field pea varieties for Canadian pulse growers,” said Dr. Bing, who has been based in Lacombe since 2003. “What I mean by genetically improved is we improve the varities through breeding.”

Though Dr. Bing’s program focuses mainly on yellow and green peas, his team has also done some work on marrowfat peas, maple peas, forage peas, mung beans, and lupins – a pulse crop that hasn’t gained much traction in Alberta. “We actually did quite a bit of work on lupins. We selected three to five lupin varieties that are adapted to fit for Alberta. Unfortunately, there’s no market for lupins in Canada.”

Mung beans, on the other hand, are showing a bit more promise.

“We have been working on the mung beans for the past several years and actually have developed three to five lines that will suitable for south Alberta,” said Dr. Bing. “There’s demand for mung beans, and from my study, I think there’s no question we can have mung bean varieties that adapted to the south part of prairies. I think the question is can we grow a profitable crop?”

Growing a profitable pulse crop of any type depends largely on breeding for the right traits. Some traits that Dr. Bing breeds for are common for every market class: high yield, lodging resistance, powdery mildew resistance, and early maturity, especially for peas growing in the northern part of the province. Seed quality is another factor he must consider. Seed uniformity is essential for food-grade peas, as is seed colour – bright yellow for yellow peas; bright green and bleaching tolerance for green peas.

For marrowfat peas, in addition to high yield, disease resistance and lodging resistance, Dr. Bing’s team also emphasizes seed size. “Seed size is critical. The size of the marrowfat is almost double to the yellow or green pea.”

When breeding forage peas, his focus is on biomass production and high protein content, in addition to high yield and powdery mildew resistance. While his program has developed three forage pea lines, with one commercialized, his work on forage peas is limited due to low demand for forage pea varieties.

Breeding for those traits can be a complicated process, depending on which trait the team is working on, according to Dr. Bing. “The majority of the traits – yield, seed quality – are controlled by multiple genes or alleles, so the improvement for those traits really depends on the ability of combining the genes from different parents and the ability to accurately identify the individual plants from the progeny that contain the genes.”

Dr. Bing uses traditional plant breeding method of hybridization – crossing two parents with desireable traits to pass those traits onto the progeny. Though the method has been a standard in plant breeding as far back as the work done by Gregor Mendel, the method relies largely on the breeder’s expertise, which can increase the complexity of the work being done.

“The method is not really new, but how to correctly use the method is really critical,” Dr. Bing said. “It’s a really complicated process that includes the correct evaluation method selection strategies. You have to analyse the data and interpret the information. To a large extent, it depends on the plant breeder’s experience and knowledge of the crop and the traits. It’s a very complicated process.”

The majority of Dr. Bing’s work is done in the field, in multiple locations. For some simple traits, such as powdery mildew resistance, Dr. Bing can select for those traits in the early generations in the greenhouse. More complicated traits, including yield and quality, must be done at multiple locations to ensure accurate data.

“Because traits like yield and quality are multi-genetic in nature, multi-generation evaluation at a single location is ineffective,” explained Dr. Bing. “Evaluation of those traits is conducted at multiple locations over multiple years.”

Dr. Bing uses a four-stage testing system in his breeding program. In the first stage, his team evaluates several lines in one location, normally in Lacombe, without replication, where they always plant the best commercial varieties as checks and select from the check varieties. The breeder’s knowledge at this stage is extremely important, according to Dr. Bing, because he or she has to decide which lines to keep and which to eliminate. In the second stage, Dr. Bing’s team tests the selected lines from the first stage in two locations in replicated trials, where, again, they plant the best commercial varieties as checks. The team ends up with about 100 lines – or 10 per cent – for the next stage. The breeding materials from the second stage are then tested at six to eight locations across the Prairie Provinces in the third stage. Ten to 20 lines will be taken forward to stage four, the cooperative registration trial crop test.

“In the co-op test, it’s standard procedure to present to the variety recommendation committee for testing in 11 to 13 locations across the prairies,” said Dr. Bing. “It’s a very, very expensive process. The cost for each line co-op test is about $2,000, so if you have 20 lines in the co-op test, it will cost you $40,000 dollars a year. We can’t really afford too many lines in the variety registration trials.”

From first making the cross to variety registration, this process takes about 10 years. After the variety is registered, it takes an additional three to four years to get the variety into the farmers’ hands. Considering the cost of testing the lines and the time it takes, developing new varieties can be a painstaking process for pulse breeders – but Dr. Bing feels positive about his program’s success.

“In a breeding program, traditionally, if you have one variety every year, that program isn’t doing bad at all,” said Dr. Bing. “In our history, we have had, on average, two or three varieties every year. The program has been very productive, and down the road, I would expect that our efforts will continue to bring one or two varieties a year.”

And this success would not be possible without grower support, according to Dr. Bing. “Organizations like APG provide additional financial support, which is critical to the breeding program. Without that support, our breeding program would be much less productive. The connection to producers and feedback we receive is essential for the breeding program.”

The financial support and feedback provided by Alberta’s pulse growers make it possible for Dr. Bing to develop lines that are responsive to producers’ needs – which, naturally, benefits the growers as well.

“Producers benefit by accessing the best varieties from our breeding program,” said Dr. Bing. “To develop a variety takes years, and they have to be really created through consistent effort, so by providing the support of the breeding program, we assure that producers have access to better varieties in the future.”

But better variety development isn’t the only way Dr. Bing is looking to the future in his program. In addition to increasing access to better varieties for producers, Dr. Bing is also working on breeding for traits that could set Canada apart on the international marketplace.

“One of the approaches I’ve taken in doing this research for about 10 years is to improve the protein content,” said Dr. Bing. “If Canadian peas have much higher protein content than the peas produced by the other countries, I would think that international buyers would like to buy Canadian peas for feed or food. High protein would be good for most types of uses.”

Dr. Bing believes that Canada’s status as the leading exporter for field peas depends on being able to define what sets Canadian peas – and pea growers – apart from those produced in other countries. “Canada has been leading export for field peas for the past 14 or so years in the world, so we need to ask, what factor has made us a leader for so many years? In order to maintain this position, what do we need to do as a nation and as individual breeders? I think that’s a critical question everybody should ask.”

Notable Varieties

  • AC Agassiz
  • AC Thunderbird
  • AC Argus
  • AC Canstar
  • AC Earlystar
  • AC Peace River
  • AC Reward

How varieties get their names

“Naming varieties for me is really difficult every year. I ask the seed company that if they have their own preference, and the company has their own system to give them promotion for the varieties. In some cases, I ask the people I’m working with – my technicians – if they have any preference. Sometimes, I’ll ask growers to suggest some names. It’s really difficult. We’re trying to establish some kind of variety naming system. It’s a difficult process.”

AAFC’s Bean Breeding Program

Dr. Parthiba Balasubramanian has one real regret from his decade-long experience as a bean breeder for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.

“We haven’t had much success on improving white mold resistance,” said Parthiba. “The white mold resistance we have today is the same white mold resistance we had in 2004.”

While white mold is a concern for Dr. Balasubramanian, his primary focus is on three other important traits that affect how beans grow in Southern Alberta conditions: high yield, early maturity, and lodging resistance.

“Southern Alberta has one of the shortest growing seasons for dry bean in Canada,” said Dr. Balasubramanian, who has been working in Lethbridge since 2007. “Our primary objective is to select for high yield and early maturity under a short growing season. Most often, high yield is associated with late maturity. It’s very hard to select for high yield for a short growing season. Doing that is exactly our primary objective.”

Dr. Balasubramanian believes that, to a large extent, the program has been successful in developing bean lines that combine both high seed yield and early maturity. A good example of that is AC Island, a Pinto bean that is widely grown in Southern Alberta. His program also has an experimental Great Northern Bean line coming that has both high yield and earlier maturity than any Great Northern line that exists in Canada today.

After high yield and early maturity, Dr. Balasubramanian focuses on lodging resistance as an avoidance mechanism for white mold, the most devastating disease of dry bean in Southern Alberta. “The more upright the plants are, it enables air movement through the plant canopy and dries the soil surface. This reduces white mold incidence in dry bean. Unfortunately, all our lines are susceptible to white mold right now. But we try to manage the white mold disease, and one way is to develop more upright bean cultivars.”

Dr. Balasubramanian’s team is also evaluating a number of bean genotypes that have more levels of white mold resistance to help manage the disease.

“What we’re currently doing is trying to enhance the yield even more, and we’re trying to add more traits – for instance, disease resistance – into the existing set of cultivars,” said Dr. Balasubramanian, who has obtained bean lines from researchers in the US and Canada and identified lines that are able to withstand white mold under Southern Alberta conditions. “We are able to use those lines as our resistant parents, and we are crossing those to adapt the cultivars that have been developed in our program. So we’re doing a straightforward cross to transfer the traits of interest into the cultivars that are already grown in Southern Alberta.”

Transferring those traits, however, is a long, painstaking process, according to Dr. Balasubramanian. “It takes six to seven years to transfer the resistance and at the same time maintain early maturity and high yield. It’s very easy to transfer resistance, but the line that has resistance may not have the high yield or the early maturity that we’re after. Without the high yield and early maturity, those varieties will not go anywhere. That is very critical for our environment in Southern Alberta, because we don’t have the luxury of a longer growing season.”

Dr. Balasubramanian’s white mold project, for example, has six or seven lines that, despite their potential, may not result in successful crosses. Crossing lines with adapted cultivars – cultivars that are currently grown in Southern Alberta – can sometimes result in incompatible crosses where the trait doesn’t transfer or the progenies die. A red bean line that showed promise and excellent yield had to be dropped at the pre co-op stage – the F7 generation – because of poor lodging resistance.

The process to get to the F7 generation is a lengthy one. After Dr. Balasubramanian’s team crosses the two parent plants, they grow the F1 generation of seeds in the greenhouse to provide the best growing environment possible for the hybrid plant. Seeds harvested from the F1 generation become the F2 generation, which are then planted in the field nursery. The team begins single plant selections in F2, F3, and F4.

“In those single plant selections, we look for uprightness and the number and distribution of pods on the plant,” Dr. Balasubramanian explained. “We can’t measure yield on a single plant, so we try to look at the number of pods the plant has just by eyeballing it. We look at if the pods are nicely distributed at the bottom of the plant so hopefully it will have high yield potential.”

The seeds from the single plants in the F4 nursery are then planted in a row – the F5 generation – and from there, the team bulk harvests the whole row. Essentially, the F5, F6, and F7 generations are yield trials, with the F7 generation as a pre co-op yield trial. If the F7 generation shows good yield, lodging resistance, and maturity, the team moves on to the cooperative registration trial, where the line is trialed for a minimum of two years at three locations in Southern Alberta and one location in Saskatchewan. After two years, if the performance of the line is acceptable, the team presents it for registration, with help from Viterra.

Because this process can take almost a decade, losing a line at the F7 generation can have serious repercussions on a breeding program. But Dr. Balasubramanian sees opportunities for reducing that timeline through molecular marker assisted selection. “We find ourselves using more and more markers to screen for bean plants with certain traits. We’re currently doing marker assisted selection for one or two traits, but I do see using it for more traits in the future.”

Some traits are easier to assess using molecular markers, according to Dr. Balasubramanian, who is looking at developing markers for bacterial wilt resistance. Normally, assessing wilt resistance takes 14 days, because the team has to grow the seedlings. Using the molecular markers decreases that period to three days.

“For specific traits, especially disease resistance, I do see using a lot more molecular markers, because it is easy and it brings efficiency to the program,” said Dr. Balasubramanian. “The time that is spent growing all these plants to maturity could now be spent elsewhere, like in a larger yield trial for instance.”

Marker assisted selection will enhance but by no means replace the selection done in the field, says Dr. Balasubramanian. “How can you assess the true potential of the plant without actually growing the plant in the field?”

This in-field work is a key component of Dr. Balasubramanian’s breeding program, where 90 per cent of the work done is applied research and the remaining 10 per cent is basic research – for instance, trying to identify bean lines and resistance to white mold.

“Even if I find a germplasm line with resistance to white mold, that won’t be of use to growers immediately. I still have to transfer the resistance from the germplasm line into the active cultivar,” said Dr. Balasubramanian. Focusing on grower needs is the cornerstone of Dr. Balasubramanian’s breeding program. As an applied research program, Dr. Balasubramanian’s work brings him in close contact with growers at almost every stage in the breeding process.

“The growers have a lot of input in terms of the objectives of the program and shaping the program,” said Dr. Balasubramanian. “Between the growers and the industry, we make sure the objectives of the program align with what the growers want.”

By investing in these types of breeding programs, organizations like Alberta Pulse Growers are also able to influence the direction of the program. Supporting Dr. Balasubramanian’s breeding program gives APG a place at the table as a stakeholder, ensuring the program is heading in the right direction. Stakeholder input and support is extremely valuable to AAFC, according to Dr. Balasubramanian, but growers benefit from it as well.

“In our breeding program, one of the ways we show impact is the uptake of our cultivars from our program,” said Dr. Balasubramanian. “In 2011, 80 to 85 per cent of the bean acres in Southern Alberta were grown with bean varieties that were developed in Lethbridge and Vauxhall. That’s how I know that the money and input our partners provide to our program directly benefits the growers.”

With over 5,000 yield trial plots in Lethbridge, 2,000 in Vauxhall, and 250 in Bow Island, Dr. Balasubramanian relies on partner investment to ensure the program has the human resources it needs to do the work that growers have prioritized. “The reason we’re able to hire these people is through external funding. That’s where the external funding makes a huge difference. Without the excellent support we get from Alberta Pulse Growers and Viterra, we wouldn’t exist here.”

Notable Varieties

  • Pinto: AC Island
  • Great Northern Bean: AC Polaris; AC Resolute
  • Black Bean: AC Black Diamond
  • Red Bean: AC Redbond

How varieties get their names

“We get input from the industry, because they are the people who will need to commercialize the line, so they should be comfortable with the name,” said Dr. Balasubramanian.

  • AC Tundra is a Great Northern line with a white seed coat colour, so Tundra fit nicely.
  • AC Island is named for Bow Island.
  • AC Resolute is named for Resolute Bay in the arctic.
  • AC Redbond, a red bean, was numbered 007, so it was named Redbond after its colour and James Bond.

CDC South’s Lentil and Chickpea Breeding Program

A unique partnership with the University of Saskatchewan breeding program has resulted in lentil and chickpea lines that are well-suited to Southern Alberta’s growing conditions, according to Dr. Manjula Bandara, Research Scientist with the Crop Diversification Centre South in Brooks.

“When I first came on 1999, we didn’t have any pulse crop improvement program at CDC South,” said Dr. Bandara, whose program focuses mainly on red lentils and kabuli chickpeas. “When we started the program in 2001, we were not breeding or crossing. Almost every line comes from the University of Saskatchewan.”

At that time, Dr. Bandara’s team grew the lines in at least one or two sites in Southern Alberta and selected the most promising lines for the area, while the University of Saskatchewan did the same for their province. “We managed to get fairly promising lines that we think are important to Southern Alberta and Saskatchewan. It’s of mutual benefit.”

In 2003, Dr. Bandara started selecting some herbicide-resistant lentils to help overcome the challenges growers were facing with weed control. From that work came CDC Maxim, a high-yielding red lentil variety that accounts for over half of the red lentil acreage in Alberta.

“Right now, Clearfield type lentil are becoming very dominant because of the weed issue,” said Dr. Bandara. “Among lentil areas here, about 90 per cent of the total lentil production in Alberta represents Clearfield type. About 57 per cent is CDC Maxim.”

Though Dr. Bandara’s breeding program is not traditional – in the sense that the breeding and crossing itself is not done at the CDC South – many of the program’s successes can be attributed to its cooperative nature, according to Dr. Bandara. “Using early generations selection makes useful and meaningful sense to us, because when we select early generations, we are selecting lines that are very suitable for a particular region or environment. For the last 20 years, the lentil growing area was between 5,000 and 8,000 acres, but in 2010, it started increasing as a result of the adoption of new lines coming out from our cooperation. Now we have come to the point that lentils are becoming interesting and important in Southern Alberta.”

Northern Alberta is starting to show some interest in lentils as well, posing a new challenge for Dr. Bandara’s team: finding early maturing varieties that will grow in the thin black soil zone. Part of this work will involve 80 early maturing lines from ICARDA.

“People are asking us if there are any varieties we can grow up north,” said Dr. Bandara. “In fact in the northern Peace region, SARDA tests lentils, and we’ve found that the newly bred lines are doing very well. Again, we need very short season varieties so that we can grow them in moist areas and thin black soil so they can be able to harvest without having any yield loss or frost damage. We’re working on that right now.”

This increase in interest for Alberta-grown lentils has led to other consumer-based research as well. With direction and support from Alberta Pulse Growers, Dr. Bandara began a project in 2010 looking at the starch composition of lentils – specifically, the resistant starch, which can deliver some of the same health benefits of both soluble and insoluble fiber. Using the facilities at the University of Alberta, Dr. Bandara’s team found some differences in resistant starch in various lentil lines. The second stage of this project now focuses on eight herbicide-resistant red lentil lines, which are being tested for various starch components in four sites in Alberta and two sites in Saskatchewan.

By exploring different lentil lines that could both improve the growers’ experience and increase consumer demand, Dr. Bandara hopes to show growers the production potential of lentils and other pulse crops.

“In the past, high-value cash crops have been grown, and pulse crops have been pushed to the marginal area,” said Dr. Bandara. “Now with the knowledge and the international demand and the local consumption, growers are starting to show real interest. We have an obligation, as a public service, to help them to achieve their goals, and in that way, we can create a win-win situation.”

And Dr. Bandara feels that creating a breeding program, with a dedicated pulse breeder, at CDC South could further increase pulse production in Southern Alberta.

 

“Saskatchewan has a good breeding program; they’re very organized and diverse,” said Dr. Bandara. “So it’s difficult for us to initiate an independent lentil breeding program here. There’s big room for us, however, to initiate other pulse crop breeding here, like mung bean, soybean, or black gram, which would not be repeated at the University of Saskatchewan. If we placed a good breeding program at CDC South, we should be able to do marker assisted breeding programs here. In that way, we should be able to complement the Saskatchewan program.”

Some work has already been done on soybeans and mung beans. “We have already done a little crossing here at the greenhouse with the good variety mung beans, and we’re very interested in Roundup ready soybean lines. We hope to develop some varieties, and if we get a breeder, we should be able to do some genomic analysis and get some sort of marker that will identify disease resistance. We are slowly building that aspect.”

The challenge lies in finding funding for a dedicated pulse breeder at a time when public funding is decreasing and competition for those dollars is stiff. But despite those challenges, Dr. Bandara remains optimistic about pulses in Southern Alberta.

“Production, productivity, and quality is so high in Southern Alberta. It’s unbeatable compared to any other area,” he concluded. “I see a bright future in Southern Alberta.”

Notable Varieties

  • CDC Maxim
  • CDC Redcliff
  • CDC Redbow
  • CDC Rosebud
  • CDC Orion (chickpea)

How varieties get their names

“Among lentils, CDC Redcliff, CDC Redbow, and CDC Rosebud were doing very well here. During the discussions with Bert Vandenberg, I told him they are doing very well here. Let’s name them using Alberta towns. The same thing happens in Saskatchewan. If you go back to lines like CDC Rosetown, there’s so many varieties coming out from their program named after their little towns to respect these little towns.”

 

 

The Difference Between Transgenic Plant DNA and Plant Breeders’ DNA Tools (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Transgenics plants are created through the introduction of DNA that originates from another species. This could be from a closely related species of plants or from as distant a species as a bacteria, fungi, or animal species. Transgenics are also referred to as GMOs or Genetically Modified Organisms. They have been used commercially in crop plants now for 20 years in many of the large scale agricultural species, such as corn, soybeans, cotton, and canola. While that is the case, there are still areas of the world that are resistant to the use of these GMO crops and their products, such as much of the EU and Japan.

Every time transgenic DNA is inserted into a strand of plant DNA, it is referred to as an “Event.” Each Event is characterised separately; this is due to the nature of the gene insertion mechanism, which is arbitrary in location. Each time a gene is inserted in a new location, it can affect the other surrounding genes on the DNA strand – turning on or off gene expression that was not intended. Because of this, every Event must be assessed; this assessment is regulated by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). Additionally, the CFIA (and similar organizations in other countries) require the creators of GMO crops to put each Event through extensive testing prior to commercial release. This is a time-consuming and expensive process.

Transgenics technology is widely used at the laboratory level, in many species, to test gene function and expression. These Events may be tested under field conditions only under strict isolation conditions as directed by the CFIA or other government regulators. These test Events can be used to quantify the expression of genes and their effects on plant development in real crop environments.

As DNA-based technology has become more developed and less expensive, plant breeders globally are using DNAbased tools to follow the genes present in their specific crops to accelerate and improve the efficiency of their breeding programs. DNA markers, as used by plant breeders, do not change the DNA of the plant; they simply allow a plant breeder to identify and follow genes and traits in plants. Marker assisted selection allows plant breeders to use genetic differences found in DNA strands rather than the trait (for example, Cotyledon color and disease resistance) itself in selecting plants. Marker assisted selection can be useful for selecting traits that are difficult to measure, vary across different environments, or are masked by other genes, such as in disease resistance genes.

These advances, both the use of transgenics and marker assisted selection, have come from our growing understanding of plant DNA and DNA tools. New traits that did not exist in a species can be introduced through transgenics. Specific genes in a species can be targeted, efficiently and accurately selected, and bred into new plant varieties with marker assisted selection.

These techniques are two different DNA-based approaches to providing both producers and consumers with high yielding, equally nutritious, and more reliable food production.

Breeding Healthier Pulses (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Higher yield. Better standability. Disease resistance. Traditionally, pulse breeders have focused on breeding better plants to suit the needs of growers. Through classical breeding techniques that involve crossing plants and observing traits, pulse breeders have developed new varieties that have made pulses easier to grow.

Now, with a burgeoning world population to feed, more and more thought is being given to developing pulses that are also healthier to eat. Limited resources, however, mean that pulse breeders must focus primarily on breeding stronger plants, not healthier seeds.

But University of Calgary researcher Dr. Dae-Kyun Ro is not a pulse breeder. Rather, he is one of the growing numbers of scientists who are laying the foundation for breeding crops with health beneficial attributes in mind.

“The history of plant breeding goes back at least 5,000 years, but our understanding of healthier crops is only very recent,” said Dr. Ro, who has a Ph.D. in the field of plant biochemistry from the University of British Columbia. “For a long time, we just did not understand the healthy components present in pulses and other plants.”

This knowledge gap has had far-reaching impacts on the work done in traditional breeding programs, according to Dr. Ro. “Breeding goals have often not been based on healthy diet but based on some other characteristics that do not directly improve our health and wellness. Thanks to the new knowledge in nutrition and plant metabolism, now we know what compounds are good for health and how these compounds are synthesized in plants.”

To that end, researchers at the University of Alberta and the University of Calgary set out to explore the health beneficial attributes of pulse crops – specifically tannins, which are known to have antioxidant and anti-carcinogenic properties. As part of this project, Dr. Ro and his team looked at a portion of the pea genome to better understand tannin biosynthesis in an effort to identify the molecular mechanism controlling the tannin synthesis in pea. By understanding the mechanism, researchers can devise methods to control the quality of tannins in pea and other pulse crops either through breeding or other molecular techniques, according to Dr. Ro.

“Studies of the genome provide a comprehensive snapshot of gene activation when tannins are being actively produced,” said Dr. Ro. “Classical experiments study one or two genes at a time, but using new genomics approaches, we can investigate thousands of genes simultaneously. We anticipated that hidden genetic components could be revealed by employing an unbiased genomics approach.”

To test this theory, Dr. Ro’s project team chose five pea cultivars, a mix of both tannin and low-tannin varieties. The team then used next-generation DNA sequencing technology and obtained more than a million sequencing reads from the different cultivars. Using a computer to analyze this data, the team compared the activation of genes in tannin-rich cultivars against low-tannin cultivars, which allowed them to link the tannin profiles with the activated parts of the pea genome.

The team found that the tannins synthesized in pea are both longer and have a higher degree of hydroxylation than the tannin identified in other crops – two traits that are related to higher levels of antioxidant activities. The team then set out to answer which genetic components in pea dictate the type, quantity, and length of tannins in different cultivars.

Using the genomics data, Dr. Ro’s team found that some low-tannin pea cultivars have mutations in the master molecular switch of tannin metabolism. His team also identified one novel genetic component that is potentially related to the tannin length. As a result of this discovery, Dr. Ro’s team is exploring the possibility of modulating tannin length.

Each of these findings can be applied to breeding pulses that have greater health attributes, according to Dr. Ro. “In all living organisms, the genome serves as a blueprint. The information for desirable traits is all coded in pulse genomes, and we can utilize genomic data to develop healthier pulse crops. For example, if we want to have a pea plant containing specific type of tannin, we can use the gene and genomic information to select specific pea lines. You can use the same principle for all useful traits.”

While classical breeding has allowed breeders to chase certain desirable traits through crossing and trait observation, breeding can be accelerated and done more predictably when accurate genome information is available because breeders will know exactly the absence or presence of certain genetic variations that are associated with physiological traits.

“Understanding the molecular mechanisms, or genes, involved in tannin synthesis in pea will give plant breeders new tools to help develop new pulse crops with nutritional value in mind in addition to the conventional target traits,” said Dr. Ro. Having the genomic information can also facilitate more rapid breeding programs, leading to the development of new crops in a shorter period of time, and possibly give Alberta farmers an advantage.

But in order to realize this advantage, organizations like Alberta Pulse Growers must continue to invest in projects that support basic scientific discovery as well as projects with immediate application in the field.

“My research is placed at the boundary of basic and applied science,” said Dr. Ro. “A lack of basic science today will not negatively influence the Alberta economy in the next five or perhaps 10 years; however, our next generation will not be competitive enough if we do not invest time and funds in basic research now.”

Dr. Ro explained that sequencing the whole pea genome is essentially a basic science project that will not influence the pea industry immediately – but the long-term benefits are already evident. “Sequence-based plant breeding is a leading-edge technology in all developed countries. It is obvious that the pea genome will play critical roles in pea breeding in the next decades.”

While agronomic traits – including increased yield, disease resistance, and lodging resistance – will continue to be a priority for Alberta pulse breeders, Dr. Ro feels that support must also be given to projects where the pay-off may not be immediate if Canada hopes to maintain a competitive agricultural industry.

Acos Breeds White Bean Success in Ethiopia (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

“I believe that the future of agriculture lays in Africa.”

As Managing Director of Acos, an agricultural commodity supply company based in Italy, Remo Pedon has an insight into the world of agriculture that can only be gained through working for over 25 years as an international pulse trader. And while his experience has proven to him the opportunities available around the globe, his confidence in Africa’s potential no doubt stems from his work in Ethiopia, where his successful seed supply system has changed the face of bean production in the heavily populated African country.

Like many other developing countries, agriculture is at the core of Ethiopia’s economy. Fertile land, adequate rainfall, and moderate climate create generally good growing conditions in the land-locked country, and as a result, agricultural commodities account for roughly 85 per cent of Ethiopia’s export market. Ethiopia’s large population is another factor in its reliance on agriculture: of its 83 million citizens, roughly 70 million live in rural areas, and 80 per cent of its labour force works in agriculture. Producers in Ethiopia are primarily smallholders, with over half farming plots of 1 hectare or smaller, and many of these producers rely on their production to feed their families.

But despite its rich resources and large labour base, only 25 per cent of arable land in Ethiopia is cultivated, and agricultural productivity remains low, partially due to a lack of infrastructure, transportation, and technology. To make matters worse, poverty in Ethiopia is rampant because of these deficiencies, and most of rural population of the country lives far below the international poverty line. As a result, Ethiopia is faced with the challenge of maximizing its agricultural productivity to ensure the livelihood of a large portion of its population.

Seeing the potential for agricultural development in the country, the Pedon family set out to help Ethiopia with this problem, through the development of Acos Ethiopia in 2005. Because beans have long been an important export commodity in Ethiopia, Pedon invested in a European standard bean cleaning and processing site facility near Addis Abeba, Ethiopia’s capital city located in the fertile Rift Valley region.

“The agricultural industry in Ethiopia is underdeveloped with an unexpressed potentiality if you consider lands and natural resources available like water,” said Pedon. “But there are several reasons that convinced us to develop a new business in Ethiopia. First of all, there are uncontaminated lands ready to be cultivated under perfect and favorable climatic conditions. The huge quantity of water available and the knowledge of beans helped us to develop rural activities in this country.”

The primary focus of these activities has been on improving the development and distribution of basic seed to smaller farmers. Working jointly with researchers from the Ethiopian Seed Enterprise, Acos Ethiopia supplied 700mt to 15,000 small farmers, most of whom received enough to plant one acre. But real headway on increasing production began in 2010, when Acos and Catholic Relief Services set out to develop a single-variety supply chain in an effort to improve the quality of the seed available to producers, resulting in a higher-yielding variety called Awash Melka.

“Strategically, the development of a single seed variety proved fundamental to the success of the Ethiopian Navy,” Pedon said. “There were multiple incentives that supported this strategy. Awash Melka had higher yields, so even if farmers achieved no price gain for growing this variety, they would increase their incomes through higher levels of production. Also, the shift to the larger seed type would increase demand for improved seed. Finally, there would be less waste, as Acos had previously bought 25 per cent more beans than needed in order to sift out the low-quality beans, which then had to find alternative markets.”

According to Pedon, factory tests showed Awash Melka to be the best of the new local varieties and to be well-suited to a single-variety supply chain because the beans looked different from other common varieties (Awash Melka beans were larger, flatter and a more creamy color than the smaller, rounder, white seeds of previous varieties.) By focusing on a single-variety model, Acos has provided growers with access to high-quality seed that, in turn, has produced higher quality results.

“Since we’ve worked in Ethiopia, economic conditions and free access to the market have become better,” said Pedon. “If we refer to economic and agricultural aspects, we have succeeded in promoting better quality and higher yields.”

And these improvements to quality and yield have increased market access for Ethiopia’s beans, according to Pedon. “In my opinion, the Ethiopian Navy pea beans are an excellent product that perfectly suits the needs of the main European and American canning industry. So we’ve connected African farmers with high-value markets. Today, farmers are able to sell their products fixing a price seven times more than the price of six years ago. This allows thousands of families to own lands and to start new activities, such as dairy farming or animal husbandry.”

This emphasis on overall sustainability for agricultural workers in Ethiopia underscores that Acos is not just helping local farmers produce better crops; the company is also helping the community as a whole, by providing employment in its Nazreth plant and free education to local children. Since it opened its doors in 2006, the Acos Ethiopia plant has grown to include 350 employees, which in turn creates income for 15,000 families. And because the plant mainly employs women – the primary family caretakers – Acos built a school next to the plant to ensure its workers had a safe, educational environment in which to leave their children while they worked. Free of charge, with free bussing and cafeteria service, the school accepts 250 children each year.

Pedon sees these efforts as an investment that will help Ethiopia realize its potential.

“So far, it has been an overwhelming experience,” Pedon said of Acos’ work in Ethiopia. “Ethiopia is a fascinating country of great potential and incredibly resourceful, able people. We can certainly say that Ethiopia has given us far more than we could possibly imagine, much more than sheer commodity. Starting a project in Ethiopia has been an enormously fulfilling experience for us all, an emotional journey that touched the lives of many, a truly rewarding experience.”

Beyond the personal rewards of creating this program in Ethiopia, there are far-reaching benefits to the world-wide agriculture industry as well, according to Pedon. “We believe that, in Ethiopia, we developed a successful network which could be a model for other countries. Moreover, I personally think that legumes are a key-commodity in the near future according to the increasing consumption, nutritional claims, affordable price, and eco-friendly aspects if we compare to other agricultural products such as grains and rice.”

And while Pedon believes that Acos’ work with white pea beans has helped reduce poverty and enhance economic development in the country, he feels that some barriers to trading with Africa remain. Production reliability and food safety are concerns for buyers across the world – but the greater challenge lies in combating the perception that, by trading with Africa, consumers are somehow taking food from hungry people. As such, the need to showcase the positive work of companies like Acos will become critical to the continued sustainability and success of small farmers in Ethiopia.

Acos, part of Pedon Group, is a privately held company specializing in the processing and sale of dried pulses and grains in bulk. With its headquarters in Italy, Acos runs its own facilities in China, Ethiopia, and Argentina, primarily important areas for agricultural commodity supplies. Thanks to a vertically integrated approach and the strictest traceability system, Acos features a complete supply chain control providing high-grade quality and GMO-free products to food industries, packers, and wholesalers all over the world.

Feeding the World’s Hungry and Growing Population (PCN Winter 2013)

This article appeared in the Winter 2013 issue of Pulse Crop News.

Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer

Despite the World Food Summit goal of halving the number of hungry in the world between 1996 and 2015, the number has remained stubbornly constant, with an uptick in the number as a result of the 2007-2008 crop price hikes. Currently the official Food and Agricultural Organization 2010-2012 estimate of the number of undernourished people is 870 million, though some aid organizations offer higher estimates.

At the same time, the world’s population is projected to grow from the current 7 billion to around 9 billion by 2050. Unsurprisingly, the question arises as to how we are going to feed 2 billion additional people by 2050, when we already have nearly 1 billion facing chronic hunger.

Recently we were asked to take part in a symposium at the Entomological Society of America annual meeting in Knoxville titled: “Feeding future generations: Expanding a global science to answer a global challenge.” The focus of that challenge was to identify ways to feed 9 billion people in 2050. What follows in a synopsis of our presentation.

We preface what follows by noting that it appears to us that the multinational biotech seed and chemical companies have responded to this challenge by positioning their products as the primary solution to meeting this goal. Not incidentally, they are also using this challenge as a justification for pressing the case for the extension of their intellectual property rights through trade negotiations.

As a result of our readings and discussion with others, it appears to us that much of the discussion about feeding 9 billion people by 2050 has been captured by these firms by setting up a false dichotomy.

On the one side, we have what might be called the current mechanized agricultural model. In this model, the goal is to bring the latest technologies (read GMOs and agricultural chemicals) to bear on solving this problem. It is argued that through the use of patented products and technologies, US farmers can boost their production to help meet the increased demand for food.

Similarly farmers in developing nations can use these same patented technologies and products to boost their crop production. But in order to make these technologies and products available, the agribusiness firms need to make sure that their intellectual property is protected. So what the companies want to do is offer the free use of products like a GMO cassava to a country’s farmers in exchange for their setting up US-style intellectual property rights and regulatory agencies in their country. The vision is to remold subsistence farmers into entrepreneurial export-oriented producers.

On the other side, they offer organic production, essentially viewing it as a post-industrial philosophical reaction to the mechanization of agriculture. They then use this reaction to describe a pre-industrial production system.

The proponents of the mechanized agricultural model go on to characterize organic production as offering lower yields and increased labor requirements as a result of higher weed and insect pressure. The argument is often summarized in the declaration that if we wanted to match current US chicken production with free-range chickens, there wouldn’t be enough acres available to do that—we’ve never tried to make that calculation.

By positing organics as the only alternative to the full use of their products, they hope to quash any challenge to their vision. They also ignore a lot of other actions that could be helpful in meeting the challenge of feeding 2 billion additional people by 2050—an increase of 28 percent over a 38-year period. In taking on this challenge, we need to remember that we were able to move from feeding a world population of 4 billion in 1974 to feeding 7 billion in 2012— an increase of 75 percent over a 38-year period.

From our vantage point, one needed action is to reduce post-harvest loss, which can be as much as a quarter to a third of the crop. To do this, low-input storage technologies need to be identified that use resources that are available to farm households and can be maintained over the long-haul by the poorest of the poor.

Returning to a theme that we have touched on before in this column, we need long-term funding for conventional breeding programs that will produce public varieties of what the US National Research Council has called “lost crops:” teff, various sorghums, amaranth, fonio, African rice, millets, and various pulses. Many of these crops currently yield about 1 tonne per hectare—compared to 10 tonnes of corn per hectare in the US—while research plots have identified landraces of these crops that can yield triple or quadruple that. A conventional breeding program could breed these high-yielding characteristics back into the local varieties that would be acceptable to local households.

While intercropping would be a problem for farmers using four-wheel-drive, diesel tractors, it is more common among farmers who depend upon hand labor for their production. And intercropping has the potential to increase total food output from a given plot of land through techniques like succession planting—that is what we do when we plant radish and carrot seeds in the same row in the spring. In Colombia we saw indigenous farmers planting squash in among the hills of corn. With targeted research, intercropping systems that increase total nutritional output per unit of land could be identified using locally grown crops.

As a recent Iowa State study showed three- and four-year rotations that includes crops and livestock can reduce the need for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers and herbicides. In some cases the task will be to help subsistence farmers recover traditional rotations that used local crops and crop varieties.

While we are not soil scientists, we cannot underestimate the importance of the issue of soil and water management. We need to pay attention to soil biotics and soil structure. Doing so could decrease water runoff, increase water infiltration, and improve nutrient availability to the plants.

None of this is difficult. The science is relatively easy. What it takes in the political will to fund programs in these areas. In saying this we are not arguing that the role of mechanized agriculture in the global North does not play a role in meeting this goal; it does. But there is more to it than that.

Oh! and we almost forgot our most important point.

The real challenge in feeding all 9 billion people in 2050 is not production; it is distribution.

Remember 1998-2001? The price of corn was $1.85 a bushel and we had 800 million hungry people in the world. But because they lacked purchasing power, 800 million people went to bed hungry while US producers were told that the low prices were caused by their “overproduction”.

The first step in meeting this challenge is to enable the farmers who are among the poorest of the poor to produce their own food using sustainable technologies that are within their resource base.

Daryll E. Ray holds the Blasingame Chair of Excellence in Agricultural Policy, Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, and is the Director of UT’s Agricultural Policy Analysis Center (APAC). Harwood D. Schaffer is a Research Assistant Professor at APAC.